Geek Answers Handbook

What is better for REST API? WCF Web API (Preview 4) or OpenRasta or something else?

I see this as a question that the WCF Web API is still in preview, and I just started looking at OpenRasta .

Although OpenRasta looks more mature than the WCF web API, I'm still a bit confused. Or please suggest if there is another better structure for building a REST API for the .NET stack.

In addition, I noticed that in OpenRasta, an aspx view containing HTML can also be displayed as a response (in ASP.NET MVC models), among other JSON / XML views. So, can I even (or recommend to me) create a web application that will also serve as a service for a 3rd party rd client developer using it? Or is it just for use as a service level?

+7
source share
3 answers

OpenRasta is much more mature than the WCF web API. OpenRasta is a self-confident REST framework. The WCF Web API does not currently have an opinion on how you should do REST, it only has opinions on how you use HTTP.

If you share OpenRasta's opinions on how to do REST, then it is perfect for you. The WCF Web API is still a preview. It has great potential, but much remains to be done.

+9
source

read the closed question

OpenRasta vs FubuMVC vs Asp.net MVC are just some thoughts

Question and answer video , use PAUSE to hold the scroll and read it.

http://gape.cc/jz822d

-

Err, it has been deleted, although I can see deleted questions, let me take a screenshot .

+4
source

OpenRasta works for both services and html sites, for which it was created. There codecs for web forms, razors, spark vision and new ones are simple enough for plugins.

+2
source

More articles:


All Articles