I also saw that some users change the assignee in the name of the reporter to ping the reporter to answer their question in the comment.
I condemn this use.
This may mean that you skip the workflow step (for example, "Waiting for a reporter") or the absence of a filter condition in the gadget or board or skip the reporterโs notification of a problem, approved / updated (or the reporter consider notifications as spam).
Correct the above and you will not need to appoint a reporter.
The reporter is the "client" of the task, and if he does not solve his task, he will not be the assignee.
Gregory kneller
source share