We are working on a serious review of our website. All work on the revised site is done in the git branch (name it 2.0), which split from the wizard some time ago. Along the way, some changes, both minor and significant, were made for development, and we would like to combine these changes in 2.0.
However, doing this as one big merge seems cumbersome - while some of the changes will be well combined, some of them are related to code that no longer exists in version 2.0, and essentially requires redefining the new features to 2.0. If unresolved conflicts occur after the merge, fixing these features can be quite difficult. We examined the use of cherry picker to bring only those changes from the master that will be well combined, and manually reprogram the main changes, but I will create problems if we ever want to merge all the changes into a 2.0 back master.
Ideally, I could do a piecewise merge from master to 2.0 - merge a group of small commits up to a specific commit, then merge one large commit and manually re-implement a certain new function, then another series in such a way that in the end, the master is completely merged into 2.0 . Is this a good approach for this situation? If so, how can I unite partly into a master, and not up to the very last command? Or is there some other, better approach I should take?
Karptonite
source share