Yes, this is a known mistake, and the Facebook developers are studying it, so they say something interesting that I found out:
I send my Facebook using 2 methods using the RestFB API , firstly, for messages with URLs like www.something.com and without URLs, I realized last night that all messages without a URL work, and those that have a URL, i.e.
So, I changed my entire implementation to post to Facebook without using the link options for all posts, with or without links.
With the link Parameter - gives an error # 1500
FacebookType publishMessageResponse = resftFBclient.publish(FACEBOOK_PAGE_ID +"/feed", FacebookType.class, Parameter.with("message", "Hello StackOverFlow!"), Parameter.with("link", "message with a link , www.me.com"));
Without a link parameter - this works even if the message contains a URL / link
FacebookType publishMessageResponse = resftFBclient.publish(FACEBOOK_PAGE_ID. + "/feed",FacebookType.class,Parameter.with("message", "My message"));
This works even if the message contains a URL / link and creates a link to the FB. Maybe FB is trying to abandon the implementation of links and let us understand that the first works the same way as the implementation of links? What's the difference?
This is cruel!
Greetings
Babajide
Babajide prince
source share