The fundamental difference between Susy 2.0 and SingularityGS

I am wondering if there are any key differences between the two grids. I do not see anything on the surface and do not know why I would like to choose one over the other. Over the past few months, I have been building sites with singularity and susy 1, and both of them worked perfectly. Both of them seem to be actively developed and built by united people. Are there any specific advantages that you offer compared to others? Are there situations in which a choice might be a better choice?

+7
sass susy-compass singularitygs susy-sass
source share
1 answer

Susy 1 and Singularity 1.1.2 offered different types of sensitive grids. However, now Susy 2.1.1 and Singularity 1.2.0 are very similar in this respect. I think Susie has included some ideas from the Singularity. I rebuilt my site using Susy 2.1.1; I used to use Singularity 1.1.2. I tried Singularity 1.2.0, but at the moment there are some changes in coding that I can not get to work. IMHO, they are both excellent, but there is one huge difference. The documentation for Susy 2.1.1 is very good, while the Singularity documentation is still minimal and the change lists don't help. There is also a video on "sass bites # 29" which, although the long-awaited one, gives a lot of help with Susy 2. I found (again) that the documentation is not perfect. For example, the methodology for setting the background or overlay grid can change, and I found (from the video) an easier way to do this. The new $ maps and new features are really useful in Susy 2 (e.g. @include break). There are many changes to the functions in Susy and Singularity, and substantial Susy documentation is needed.

+6
source share

All Articles