Answer the nose.
duplicates=false; for (j=0;j<zipcodeList.length;j++) for (k=j+1;k<zipcodeList.length;k++) if (k!=j && zipcodeList[k] == zipcodeList[j]) duplicates=true;
Edited to switch .equals() to == , since I read somewhere you use int , which was not clear in the initial question. Also set k=j+1 to shorten the execution time, but still O (n 2 ).
The faster (within the limit) path
It uses a hash approach. You have to pay for autoboxing, but O (n) instead of O (n 2 ). The adventurous soul wanted to find a primitive set of hashes based on int (Apache or Google Collections has such a thing, understand.)
boolean duplicates(final int[] zipcodelist) { Set<Integer> lump = new HashSet<Integer>(); for (int i : zipcodelist) { if (lump.contains(i)) return true; lump.add(i); } return false; }
Worship HuyLe
See HuyLe's answer for a more or less O (n) solution, which, it seems to me, needs a few extra steps:
static boolean duplicates(final int[] zipcodelist) { final int MAXZIP = 99999; boolean[] bitmap = new boolean[MAXZIP+1]; java.util.Arrays.fill(bitmap, false); for (int item : zipcodeList) if (!bitmap[item]) bitmap[item] = true; else return true; } return false; }
Or just be compact
static boolean duplicates(final int[] zipcodelist) { final int MAXZIP = 99999; boolean[] bitmap = new boolean[MAXZIP+1];
Does it mean that?
Ok, so I ran a little test, which, of course, is everywhere, but here is the code:
import java.util.BitSet; class Yuk { static boolean duplicatesZero(final int[] zipcodelist) { boolean duplicates=false; for (int j=0;j<zipcodelist.length;j++) for (int k=j+1;k<zipcodelist.length;k++) if (k!=j && zipcodelist[k] == zipcodelist[j]) duplicates=true; return duplicates; } static boolean duplicatesOne(final int[] zipcodelist) { final int MAXZIP = 99999; boolean[] bitmap = new boolean[MAXZIP + 1]; java.util.Arrays.fill(bitmap, false); for (int item : zipcodelist) { if (!(bitmap[item] ^= true)) return true; } return false; } static boolean duplicatesTwo(final int[] zipcodelist) { final int MAXZIP = 99999; BitSet b = new BitSet(MAXZIP + 1); b.set(0, MAXZIP, false); for (int item : zipcodelist) { if (!b.get(item)) { b.set(item, true); } else return true; } return false; } enum ApproachT { NSQUARED, HASHSET, BITSET}; public static void main(String[] args) { ApproachT approach = ApproachT.BITSET; final int REPS = 100; final int MAXZIP = 99999; int[] sizes = new int[] { 10, 1000, 10000, 100000, 1000000 }; long[][] times = new long[sizes.length][REPS]; boolean tossme = false; for (int sizei = 0; sizei < sizes.length; sizei++) { System.err.println("Trial for zipcodelist size= "+sizes[sizei]); for (int rep = 0; rep < REPS; rep++) { int[] zipcodelist = new int[sizes[sizei]]; for (int i = 0; i < zipcodelist.length; i++) { zipcodelist[i] = (int) (Math.random() * (MAXZIP + 1)); } long begin = System.currentTimeMillis(); switch (approach) { case NSQUARED : tossme ^= (duplicatesZero(zipcodelist)); break; case HASHSET : tossme ^= (duplicatesOne(zipcodelist)); break; case BITSET : tossme ^= (duplicatesTwo(zipcodelist)); break; } long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); times[sizei][rep] = end - begin; } long avg = 0; for (int rep = 0; rep < REPS; rep++) { avg += times[sizei][rep]; } System.err.println("Size=" + sizes[sizei] + ", avg time = " + avg / (double)REPS + "ms"); } } }
With NSQUARED:
Trial for size= 10 Size=10, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for size= 1000 Size=1000, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for size= 10000 Size=10000, avg time = 100.0ms Trial for size= 100000 Size=100000, avg time = 9923.3ms
With hashset
Trial for zipcodelist size= 10 Size=10, avg time = 0.16ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 1000 Size=1000, avg time = 0.15ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 10000 Size=10000, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 100000 Size=100000, avg time = 0.16ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 1000000 Size=1000000, avg time = 0.0ms
With bitset
Trial for zipcodelist size= 10 Size=10, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 1000 Size=1000, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 10000 Size=10000, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 100000 Size=100000, avg time = 0.0ms Trial for zipcodelist size= 1000000 Size=1000000, avg time = 0.0ms
BITSET Winner!
But just for the hair .... 15ms is within the error range for currentTimeMillis() , and there are some gaping holes in my test. Note that for any list longer than 100,000, you can simply return true because there will be a duplicate. In fact, if the list looks like random, you can return true WHP for a much shorter list. What is morality? In the limit, the most efficient implementation is:
return true;
And you will not be mistaken very often.