This is an interesting bit of code.
One possibility is to ensure that each of the calls to the batch methods is the same object. If some other code modifies this.batch in a different thread, one of the possible results could be to call some methods on one instance of the Batch object, while the rest of the calls go to another instance of the batch object.
Another possibility is that some programmers transfer ideas and styles from other languages ââ(in this case, a language where you must use an identifier such as "I" to access the current instance), in which case they may have tried to avoid retype this.batch.
Without knowing more about the sample code, I can only guess.
Simon g
source share