Problem Scenario:
We had several instances of duplicate emails sent, so I implement a lock to prevent multiple streams of messages from being sent simultaneously.
So, you use Lock() to prevent this, which means that you need to synchronize the threads by accessing the _mailQueueRepository , which in this case is _mailQueueRepository
But then again in the same code you are using _mailQueueRepository without Lock
So, this is a warning that your valuable resource is available in two different forms: one as synchronized (thread-safe) and the other non-synchronized (insecure thread).
And this is a warning that lets you know (or allow you to identify) problems that may arise as a result of this conflicting use of the _mailQueueRepository resource. The choice is yours, either for all uses of _mailQueueRepository synchronized (use with Lock , and the warning will not), or will not work in race conditions.
In addition, you might consider restructuring the codes so that the called SendQueuedMessage() called with parameters that are extracted from _mailQueueRepository , avoiding the use of the mix.
Kavindu dodanduwa
source share