What are the benefits of using a jet router over a cadier: a meteor flow router

Question

I am new to meteor and react. I was looking for best practices for developing my voting-based project with a meteorite and response. One of the problems I was trying to find on the Internet is the pros and cons of using one of the two options for a meteor router.

kadira: flow-router seems pretty easy to implement, but I see a lot of github projects that implement a reactive router instead.

Are there any ideas on comparing meteor router packets?

Answer 1

If you focus on Meteor with React, I recommend flow-router .
If not, select a reaction router or reduction router (for short).

I have to say that the reaction router uses a lot of skills with the concept of response, for example, writing the JSX component for the router and using the context to send its url parameters. If you try to go deeper, you will learn more about how to respond to yourself. This will help you build an application outside of Meteor, and that is why I recommend a responsive router.