Actually there is no right rule for whether you should name a super-implementation of this method. This is something that should be determined on an individual basis, depending on the recommendations from the documentation for implementing this superclass method and your requirements.
To explain why the two examples you included can be what they are, we can look at the documentation for - [UIView drawRect:] , which reads:
If you subclass UIView directly, your implementation of this method need not be called super. However, if you subclass a different view class, you should call super at some point in your implementation.
and documentation for - [NSObject awakeFromNib] , which states:
You must invoke the awakeFromNib super implementation to give the parents of the classes the opportunity to perform any additional initialization that they require. Although the default implementation of this method is nothing, many UIKit classes provide non-empty implementations.
In most cases, this is probably a safe bet that you should call a super-implementation of the method (see comments below). However, be careful, some methods require you to call them a super implementation, some do not, and some even require you to call a super implementation at some point in your redefinition. Therefore, remember when you are in doubt, always refer to the documentation.
Mick maccallum
source share