Something good and something bad in SharePoint

Question

I am trying to wrap my head around SharePoint. Why is it good? Why is that bad?

At first glance, it offers some incredible collaboration tools. However, the cost looks astronomical, and it seems tough and complicated to set up.

those who have worked with SharePoint; please describe something good and something bad.

Answer 1

Pros:

• Document management is the best known feature and integrates well with Office 2007.
• Create group calendars that can be superimposed on your personal Outlook and managed online.
• Notifications in response to certain actions on the group’s website.
• Functionality like Wiki with full integration into the Office stack.
• A complete database backend that gives you the reliability and security of true RDBMS.
• Extremely customizable if you choose to develop custom websites using ASP.NET (not a built-in wizard / gui editor).
• Form Data Collection

Minuses:

• The free version is somewhat limited in configuration.
• How to handle multiple editors on a single file is not obvious.
• The workflow for offline editing documents is not obvious.
• A very steep learning curve for using it is the right way.
• How to get people to use this is how to get people to go to the dentist.
• Flash patterns do not do much.
• Setting up without writing code really limits your options.
• Integration with old office ugly versions
• Mac integration doesn't exist (has this changed recently?)

Answer 2

It has pretty good Office 2007 integration. For example, Excel understands when you checked a file and you can check it (with comments) when you close it. Document management simplifies version control (although this is not required, you can use one version for each file).

In SharePoint, everything is essentially an internal list, and it’s very easy to create a custom one. In a related note, I have not used it yet, but it seems to work well with workflows and InfoPath.

On the other hand, it is pretty much a beast resource. This requires several machines with powerful specifications, especially if you want to “really” use it to manage documents and be the basis of your intranet / website. It scales to some extent, but it is not very good from my point of view.

Customization presents its own challenges. You really need people who are focused on it full time, since administration and customization require their own impressive learning curves.

Finally, some of the parts of the box are poorly implemented. Wiki is a prime example; in fact, it is useless. Therefore, you need to keep in mind that some may consider SharePoint as a holistic package as "best in class" (not to say what I'm doing!), Its individual functions are often not.

Answer 3

Good Out of the box, it offers a ton of functionality and power even for spare parts. Just creating a document library that anyone can open / edit / download, is simple ... even for those who are not connected to the web interface among us.

Bad Almost everything else.

• The "Discussion Tip" is an illustrious Outlook email conversation.
• The disconnection between achieving similar results in SharePoint Designer 2007 and using the web interface is annoying and annoying.
• Attempting to customize the look of a SharePoint site usually ends in disaster. Especially with WSS 3.0.
• The nickel and flicker pattern between the WSS 3.0 and MOSS 2007 levels is absolutely painful; WSS 3.0 is just not functional enough to be extremely frustrating to use
• Changing MS styles is nearly impossible due to their horribly laid out and unpleasant large CSS file.
• THIS IS FOR 2009 ... GET THE STEELS FOR THE SOME DATA TABLE ALREADY!

This is a beast to use. And the transfer of two complete rebranding projects for two completely different areas of the company leads me to a nervous breakdown. Especially when opening the core.css file, sometimes all styles are given that I redefined to get a default reset. Without anything done by me, except for just OPENING the file. And there is no way to undo these changes.

Answer 4

The good thing: a great communication tool. Instead of sending company public email, you can post an ad on your SharePoint site. Users can subscribe to the RSS feed of ads or send an email notification when the list is updated.

The bad thing: the error messages displayed on the SharePoint site are general, and the link to help solve the problem is rarely any help.

Answer 5

Good:

This is a great collaboration tool. Starting development for sharepoint is easy if you are familiar with ASP.NET web pages.

Poorly:

The development life cycle is not fully implemented. By the way, there are no built-in testing tools.

Answer 6

SharePoint is evolving and becoming the best collaboration tool for Microsoft Office environments. It works well in small and medium-sized businesses. implementing “best practices” when setting up is critical ; otherwise it will quickly become a nightmare to maintain and use.

For “best practices,” here are two books that I recommend for SharePoint 2007:

• Essential SharePoint 2007

• Sharepoint 2007

Answer 7

Many interesting things about Sharepoint are available in Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0, free with Windows Server 2003/2008. All you need is a license for SQL Server 2000 and later, which is available in most mirosoft stores. In WSS, you can perform document management, workflows, custom sites, blogs, wikis, etc.

If you need Excel Services, Form Server, CMS, or some other MOSS features, then this is another thing. And yes, it costs a lot of money, but in most cases it is cheaper than doing it from scratch.

Advantages:
- Great object model. - Many good features out of the box.

Disadvantages: - Keep the learning curve to do everything right. “It's very easy to hang yourself by doing something wrong.” - Debugging and deployment is about as enjoyable as the root canal.

Answer 8

good:

You can do a lot. Wokflowks, InfoPath forms, Excel Services, business data catalogs, etc.

Poorly:

You cannot easily describe it. Must have sharepoint administration and development skills for good solutions that do not improve quickly.

Answer 9

If you have a license for Microsoft Server 2003, you can install the standalone version of Sharepoint for free! Download Sharepoint

Installation is very simple when using an internal database.

Microsoft Office Sharepoint Designer 2007 is a must for any customization.

I created a couple of corporate networks using Sharepoint and was very pleased with its features. Microsoft Office 2007 works seamlessly with sharepoint.

I found Sharepoint very powerful and easy to learn. There are many people developing sites using sharepoint. The setting level is amazing. The simplest setup is done in your browser, the next level uses Microsoft Sharepoint Designer 2007 and, finally, using Visual Studio to create new applications (web pages).