In my opinion, Kozarchuk is right:
The problem is not so much in poor time estimates as in poor / impossible area estimates.
Displaying the result or result layouts for the client / manager as early as possible when checking the accuracy of the codes leads to a better understanding of the goals / requirements.
Remember: A project is successful if it “makes customers happy” when it is done, and not when it meets the requirements known to the analyst when the project was originally launched.
Naturally, this means that a " moving target " is the rule, not a bad one, and there is nothing to fear. It also means that I, as the project manager / architect, must ensure that the cost of changes in scope can be / will be transferred and covered .
How it's done?
- Demo early, demo often (users and their managers in the same room)
- Change Queries Mentality. (Thus, the client knows what the changes are and what the changes are, and therefore the client can use them to reorient their project a la carte).
- Be honest, talk with the client and the developers .. and make sure that they also talk to each other.
Does it always work? NOT
lexu
source share