Geek Answers Handbook

XHTML 1.0 Transitional vs XHTML 1.0 Strictly?

As for SEO, for the client point of view, should I use XHTML 1.0 Transitional or XHTML 1.0 Strict?

Why are some people still using Transitional?

Will we lose something if we use Transitional over Strict?

+6
xhtml
source share
5 answers

XHTML Strictly forces you to use semantic markup, where Transitional is more flexible and allows you to use obsolete presentation elements such as <font> and <center> .

People still use Transitional to support earlier markup, but that doesn't make any difference to SEO. Strict is considered best for encouraging more accessible XHTML and better separation of content and presentation.

+10
source share

From an SEO perspective, no difference.

+4
source share

I don’t think there is any influence on the use of one or the other: what really matters is the content , not the (X) HTML (Strict / Transitive).

+2
source share

Echo comments that should not matter.

In my opinion, it’s better to choose one and make sure your site checks it.

Also note that ASP.NET can spit out strictly as follows in the web.config file

<system.web> <xhtmlConformance mode="Strict" /> </system.web>

+1
source share

This is a good article explaining the differences: http://24ways.org/2005/transitional-vs-strict-markup

+1
source share

More articles: