Currently, Microsoft's position remains the same. They focus on meeting the needs of their users, trying to fix the errors that occur most often. In addition, they are trying to add support for the most frequently requested features.
They say in your first link . As we said in MIX10, we will continue to build standards support on the IE9 platform, and as a by-product, our ACID3 score will increase. " and I heard them say it elsewhere.
They DO NOT "encode a test." They are not going to try to fix specific parts of ACID 3 that are not working. Rather, they are trying to improve IE 9 as a whole by addressing the failures that they consider most important. Only as a result of this will the ACID improve. I think this is a good strategy. If ACID 3 requires 1000 hours of programmer, but the same amount of time can fix 2 or 3 really POPULAR errors that ACID 3 does not address (it is not intended to ensure full), I would think that their resources are better spent on those more popular mistakes.
Obviously, their priorities should be endlessly discussed. Like the amount of success they have. So even if not there. :)
Update:. I would like to back up my claim that Acid 3 is not comprehensive with this link: From http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/
"Acid3 was not the only and only indicator of browser performance. In fact, many other test suites are much more important."
and
"Many of the subtests are high on the developers' wish list: support for Full CSS 3 selectors, media queries, SVG fonts. Admittedly, some others are testing edge cases and other esoteric functions, but the test should have been a significant challenge!"
Although I am not an IE user, it is better for us if Microsoft adheres to the improvement of important material and passes the tests that test the "esoteric functions".
Chris
source share