I used WebView quite a bit, and usually the performance was great and very convenient.
- Html5 compatibility is good.
- JavaScript performance varies, but I found about a third of the speed of the latest version of Chrome according to the Google V8 benchmark (which Chrome apparently seems to be tuned for).
- Rendering performance was not a big problem.
- Very intense HTML Webapps, such as some of the Chrome experiment library, did not start as fast as in some other browsers.
- WebGL is not supported, so sites that return to software rendering graphics from WebGL are much slower.
The biggest problem I encountered in WebView is that it is not so stable for advanced features and intensive use as other browsers, but does not cause serious performance problems.
Here are a few benchmarks (the version of WebView used was obtained from JavaFX 2.2 build 9):
Conformity
Running the html5 test to verify html5 compliance (out of 500 ratings):
Chrome 19 402 + 13 bonus points
Firefox 12 345 + 9 bonus points
WebView 2.2b9 296 + 7 bonus points
IE 9.0.6 138 + 5 bonus points
Running the acid3 test, browsing 100/100 web pages is similar to other test browsers, but like IE9, the final rendering has a slight imperfection.
Javascript
Sunspider Javascript Test (lower is better):
IE 9.0.6 146.7ms
Chrome 19 151.5ms
Firefox 12 185.8ms
WebView 2.2b9 199.5ms
Google V8 Javascript Test (Higher, Better):
Chrome 19 15323
Firefox 12 9557
WebView 2.2b9 5145
IE 9.0.6 3661
Mozilla Kraken Javascript Test (lower is better):
Chrome 19 2416.8ms
Firefox 12 2112.9ms
WebView 2.2b9 7988.9ms
IE 9.0.6 9403.0ms
Intense canvas
Spinning 3D Buddha (better):
Chrome 19 60fps
Firefox 12 43fps
IE 9.0.6 16fps
WebView 2.2b9 7fps
JQuery
JQuery test suite (lower is better):
Chrome 19 21826ms
WebView 2.2b9 22742ms
Firefox 12 23554ms
IE 9.0.6 28247ms
Based on the tests above (work on my Windows 7 desktop), while WebView is stable and functional enough for you, then the performance of WebView and other browsers should not be a problem (as long as your application does not have many 3D spinning buddhas ...: - )
Update
As uta response states, the JavaScript JIT compiler is included to create a 32-bit build of WinForm 2.2 and to build a 64-bit version of WinForm 2.2 in JavaFX 2.2. This means that WebView JavaScript tests are significantly slower (usually 4-5 times slower) when running the 64-bit version of JavaFX and the 32-bit version of JavaFX.