How to prevent full use of the website and mirroring elsewhere?

I heard a lot of stories from people who had their sites integrated elsewhere, so that visitors to other sites saw the original, not even knowing that the site does not have its own content, but simply serves some other resource?

I understand that people do this to promote their resources through (ab), using the work of others. Is there any other reason for this tactic?

In particular, how to prevent it?

+1
security website
Jul 17 '09 at 11:48
source share
3 answers

In short, you cannot. But, fortunately, they can only copy your foreground data. Your CSS, markup and JavaScript are all there. You must indicate in the footer that your content is your property and cannot be copied or distributed in any way without your prior consent. This does not hold back anyone motivated enough to copy in the first place, but it gives you more options for any future disputes.

Some measures can be taken to really make the process of stealing your content quite tedious. Many users will confuse their JavaScript, making it almost incomprehensible (without cleaning it up a bit.) This is a very small wall for scaling for a thief, and should not be considered as a solution to solving all problems.

Unfortunately, some people are evil. And they will remain evil.
+4
Jul 17 '09 at 11:53
source share

Someone may try to make money by showing ads complete with good content (created by others). A lot of good content = a lot of visitors = a lot of clicks on ads = some money. Of course, this is wrong, but, of course, there is no way to prevent it technically. While you can read it, the machine can copy it.

0
Jul 17 '09 at 11:55
source share

I think the only solution is to maintain an ever-changing website that users come to in order to see new content and interact with it so that comments spread the new content. Then the transition to mirror weight will be considered as an inconvenience for both users and authors. Of course, this does not hinder mirroring, but only makes it less appropriate, I hope.

0
Oct 08 '14 at 14:26
source share



All Articles