If you step back, what you observe is the difference in the security philosophy, between the Java runtime model, as originally embodied in Sun JVMs, and the Android runtime model.
The original design of Java VM was designed for a system in which several mutually suspicious applications (or "applets" in the Java language) will simultaneously be in the same address space running in the same virtual machine. Since the designers did not want one application to be bothered with another, they faced great difficulties in defining a security model inside the VM that would forbid things like one object relating to private fields of another object of another class.
However, the Java library ended up with different "escape hatches" from the security model. One of them is setAccessible() on reflection objects, as you noticed.
The Android model is different: Android uses processes as the boundary of security and isolation of an isolated application, rather than trying to insert it into a process, as was done using traditional JVMs. This allows you to completely solve the problem of the Java security model, except that it helps the application "save it from itself." That is, it is a good design to not have an object that would be poked into other private objects of the object, and the standard Java security model provides just that.
Leaving aside the question of how people change your code, with Android, as the author of the application, you manage all the code that ends in the process of your application. If you decide to include code that calls setAccessible() in your company. You may be shooting in the foot, but you, of course, will not take off the feet of other applications, since the Android security model, operating at the process level, inherently does not allow this to happen. Similarly, using native code will completely destroy you from the Java object model, which allows you to completely overload you in any situation, but also allows you to express some things more productively than you could in Java. This is a compromise, but it is a compromise between developers and developers, and not one that especially affects anything else that happens on your phone / device.
I know this does not directly answer your question, but I hope that it provides some useful context.