Are web safe colors relevant?

Since the vast majority of monitors are 16-bit color or more, including mobile devices , does it even make sense to consider web-based color security when choosing color schemes? Or is it something that should be referred to as a piece of history?

For those of you who don't know which web safe colors:

Another set of 216 color values ​​is usually considered the “Internet Safe” color palette, developed at a time when many computer displays were capable of displaying 256 colors. A set of colors would need anti-aliasing on 256-color displays; number 216 was chosen in part because computer operating systems are reserved from sixteen to twenty colors for their own use; he was also chosen because he allows exactly six shades of red, green and blue (6 × 6 × 6 = 216).

A list of colors is often displayed as if it has special properties that make them immune to smoothing. In fact, on 256-color displays, applications can set the palette to any color choice they choose, smoothing out the rest. These colors were chosen precisely because they coincided with the palettes selected then by leading browser applications. [Wikipedia]

+57
design colors
Jun 24 '09 at 21:30
source share
13 answers

For me, the web-safe color palette is no longer the main concern. Optimize for the largest target audience.

According to w3schools site visitors:

  • In January 2009, 1% of site visitors had 256 color displays , 95% of users 24 or 32 bits.
  • [Update] In January 2015, 0.5% had 256 colors , 0.5% had 24 bits and 99% had 32 bits.

I found similar numbers from the business application website that I run:

32-bit 79.01% 24-bit 15.64% 16-bit 5.27% 8-bit 0.08% 
+65
Jun 24 '09 at 23:19
source share

I don't think web safe colors are relevant. For me, a much bigger problem for smartphones is all 960px fixed width webpages.

+20
Jun 24 '09 at 21:33
source share

I think that the most important thing when choosing a color palette is to keep in mind color blindness. There are several different types that I know of, but the main thing is to make sure that you have enough contrast between the colors.

For example, green text on a red background may be easier for some to read, but very difficult or perhaps impossible for others (5-10% of men!), Especially if the color values ​​are close.

+14
Aug 18 '09 at 20:29
source share

For those of us who I am, as I, who did not know exactly what safe colors are on the Internet, they were

designed at a time when many computer displays were capable of displaying 256 colors. A set of colors would need anti-aliasing on 256-color displays; number 216 was chosen in part because computer operating systems are reserved from sixteen to twenty colors for their own use; he was also chosen because he allows exactly six shades of red, green and blue (6 × 6 × 6 = 216).

A list of colors is often displayed as if it has special properties that make them immune to smoothing. In fact, on 256-color displays, applications can set the palette to any color choice they choose, smoothing out the rest. These colors were chosen precisely because they coincided with the palettes that were then selected by the leading browser applications.

It is difficult to imagine any of these applications for modern modern displays, since almost no one starts displaying them in 256 colors anymore (if, perhaps, they do not play the old version of Larry's Leisure Suit ).

+7
Jun 24 '09 at 21:40
source share

In my opinion, his story.

+3
Jun 24 '09 at 21:33
source share

It depends on what you mean by safe colors on the Internet.

In terms of 16-bit color, this is probably not a concern. However, colors do not display the same on all devices. This can lead to all kinds of problems, especially if the settings for the gamut of designers are different from the settings for your particular monitor.

So, you still need to test your design in several settings.

+3
Jun 24 '09 at 21:39
source share

According to the study, even safe colors on the Internet were not safe on the Internet . It was an interesting idea, although it was important, fortunately, for the time being.

+2
Oct 13 '10 at 5:38
source share

Safe colors on the Internet to a large extent are not a problem, unless you are dealing with consumers who have equipment for video ads (I think 10 years).

+1
Jun 24 '09 at 21:36
source share

IMHO, the point is really controversial. Colors that are not safe on the Internet anyway. It may not look the best in modes with 256 colors, but as long as the functional elements of the page / application do not depend on these colors, this will not greatly interfere with the user's work.

In addition, most users surfing in 256-color modes will be aware that the colors will be pushed off, because I don’t think that many sites are more tied to web safe colors.

+1
05 Oct '10 at 11:27
source share

Yes, it is definitely a thing of the past. Put its value right next to your selection marks.

0
Jun 24 '09 at 10:01
source share

Some colors are not displayed on some mobile devices. (trying to make a list)

Headings should be blue, fade from CSS:

 background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #0099CC1, #0033CC) repeat-x scroll 0 0 #006DCC; 

On many devices, the background is not displayed, and the title looks like white-on-white.

0
Sep 05 '13 at 19:51 on
source share

Since safe browser colors are no longer relevant, asking a new question and sending an answer, it does not look like a genius. So, I'm just trying to explain the hint to determine safe browser colors by just looking at this hex code

For the hexadecimal color #xxyyzz color is a browser if

  • For couples:

    • position 12 ie xx values ​​are the same
    • position 34 ie yy values ​​are the same
    • position 56 ie zz values ​​are the same
  • Valid Values:

    • 0
    • 3
    • 6
    • 9
    • FROM
    • F
0
Jan 11 '16 at 6:43
source share

This is still important if your goal is very poor for developing countries, such as countries in South Asia. I personally have a full-blown IPS monitor with Windows 10, so this is not a problem for me, but we are a minority, and most of them have old hardware / computer / operating systems besides mobile phones, since it’s cheap to buy the latest mobile phone but computer equipment is expensive due to taxes / import costs, etc. compared to the salary of the average person. I personally witnessed that many people still use the old PC with Windows XP, 98 with 256 colors on Pentium 4 processors. Therefore, if you are targeting such an audience, it is better to use web-safe colors, but if you practice business, it’s not worth it, because they are less likely to be your customers, but if you create an information website, blog, activist website where people can read and receive information without having to pay for something, and then use an alternative topic or what something with web safe etami. since such people are mainly on windows xp / 98, try to find the OS, and if the user is from such operating systems, then use the backup theme.

So remember that most people in this world are poor, and most people still use old equipment and technology. If you want to cover them all without working very hard on the current topic, then always use fallback themes. One for older mobile phones, one for older desktop displays, one for modern displays and modern mobile phones (responsive).

0
Mar 05 '17 at 21:33
source share



All Articles